John Martinis, China Is Only Nanoseconds Behind US in Quantum Tech.
- Nobel Prize winner John Martinis warns that China has effectively closed the technological gap with the US in quantum computing.
- The Trump administration is reportedly shifting its strategic focus from AI to quantum technology to address this national security threat.
![]() |
| Photo by Anastasiya D on Unsplash |
The United States has long enjoyed a comfortable lead in the development of next generation computing technologies. That era of unquestioned dominance is officially over. John Martinis serves as a professor at UC Santa Barbara and is one of this year's Nobel Prize winners in Physics. He recently issued a stark warning during an interview in . He stated that the distance between American and Chinese capabilities in quantum computing has narrowed to a terrifying degree. The race is no longer measured in years but in nanoseconds.
This competition matters because the stakes involve far more than just processing speed. A fully functional quantum computer represents a master key to the digital world. The technology utilizes the unique properties of quantum mechanics to solve problems that are impossible for classical machines. This includes the ability to break the encryption standards that currently protect global banking systems and military communications. Martinis estimates that practical applications for this technology are only five to ten years away. The nation that crosses the finish line first will possess a decisive strategic advantage.
The speed of China's ascent has shocked many industry veterans. Martinis previously worked at Google and helped the tech giant achieve "quantum supremacy" in 2019. This milestone marked the moment a quantum computer performed a task faster than a classical supercomputer. At that time experts estimated that China was lagging about three years behind Western development. That buffer zone has completely evaporated in the years since. The Chinese research sector proved to be far more agile and capable than anticipated.
Martinis points to the publishing cycle as evidence of this rapid catch up. He reads the research papers coming out of China and sees a deep understanding of the underlying physics. He noted that when Western scientists publish a breakthrough regarding new capabilities a Chinese team often publishes a matching result within a couple of months. They are not merely copying the work. They are understanding it and replicating it with frightening speed. This rapid iteration cycle has turned a comfortable lead into a dead heat.
The technology itself relies on qubits which are fundamentally different from the binary bits used in your laptop or phone. A traditional bit is either a zero or a one. A qubit can exist in both states simultaneously. This allows for exponential increases in processing power. Google recently demonstrated this potential with its "Willow" chip. The company claims the chip ran an algorithm 13,000 times faster than the world's most powerful supercomputer. These are the kinds of leaps that turn theoretical science into hard power.
Martinis has taken his concerns directly to the highest levels of the American government. He visited the White House several weeks ago to brief officials on the state of the industry. He reports that the Trump administration is fully aware of the threat. The government previously focused its energy on maintaining an edge in artificial intelligence. Martinis says they are now pivoting their attention to the quantum battlefield. They understand that losing this race is not an option for national security.
Martinis continues to push the boundaries of the hardware himself. He founded a company called Qolab after leaving Google in 2020. He was in . to install a new superconducting qubit device in collaboration with the . Quantum Computing Center. This project aims to make the hardware available to researchers globally. Martinis will accept his Nobel Prize next week in Stockholm alongside colleagues John Clarke and Michel Devoret. Their work created the foundation for this revolution. The political reality of who controls that revolution is now the pressing question.
